Witchfinder General (1968) – Review

Some horror films entertain. Some horror films scare. Witchfinder General just fixes its gaze on you, mutters “you’re doomed,” and slaps you across the face with raw cruelty. Vincent Price, usually the maestro of gothic camp, here gives one of his coldest and most viciously restrained performances. No cobwebby castles or spooky theatrics; just a grim march through human depravity with Michael Reeves as your merciless guide.

England, 1645. While the country is tearing itself apart in the Civil War, Matthew Hopkins (Vincent Price) spots a career opportunity. Forget soldiering, this sharp-eyed opportunist decides he’ll make more money (and gain more power) by “hunting witches.” Armed with nothing but a sneer, a fake title, and a creepy assistant/torturer named John Stearne (Robert Russell), Hopkins begins dragging terrified villagers into makeshift trials, torturing confessions out of them, and billing magistrates for the privilege.

 

Early modern capitalism at its finest.

Meanwhile, young Roundhead Richard Marshall (Ian Ogilvy) survives a skirmish, earns a promotion, and promptly gallops home to see his beloved Sara (Hilary Heath). Sara’s uncle, kindly priest John Lowes (Rupert Davies), warns Marshall that storm clouds are coming—translation: “The script says I’ll be dead by act two.” Marshall vows to marry Sara and protect her, but then fate decides to kick him square in the breeches. On his ride back to duty, he encounters Hopkins and Stearne, innocently giving them directions to his own village. Big mistake.

 

Marshall, noble hero, but an unlucky bastard.

Hopkins and Stearne waste no time. Lowes is accused of witchcraft, prodded with needles, and tortured until Sara tries bargaining with Hopkins for her uncle’s life. Unfortunately, Hopkins is called away, leaving Stearne to commit rape because apparently one villain in this movie wasn’t vile enough. Hopkins returns, pretends to be scandalized by Stearne’s “enthusiasm,” then casually signs Lowes’s death warrant anyway. By the time Marshall returns, the priest is hanged, Sara is traumatized, and Marshall is out for blood. Of course, when one is going up against a character played by Vincent Price, there is usually but one outcome.

 

Good or bad, it’s all going to end in tears.

The final act turns into a brutal revenge story. Marshall vows to kill Hopkins and Stearne, tracks them through the countryside, and eventually finds himself captured along with Sara, accused of witchcraft, and subjected to the same tortures. But Roundhead rage is stronger than rope. Marshall breaks free, stomps Stearne’s face, and hacks Hopkins to bits with an axe. Just when you think Hopkins is gone, his agony is ended by a soldier’s bullet. Marshall, however, loses his mind entirely, screaming into the void as Sara descends into madness beside him. The Civil War may rage on outside, but in this dungeon, humanity has already collapsed.

 

“This will definitely hurt you more than me.”

Stray Observations:

• Matthew Hopkins is possibly the most punchable man in history. His resting smug face should be classified as a war crime.
• A “witch” gets the full torch-and-pitchfork send-off by burning… except England never actually used fire for witchcraft executions.
• Marshall, our “hero,” is basically fueled entirely by righteous fury and poor decision-making. Dude, maybe don’t give directions to the guy who looks like Satan’s tax auditor.
• Sara spends half the movie as a symbol of innocence and the other half being horrifically tormented. Hammer heroines had it rough, but this is next-level cruel.
• Historically, Hopkins executed over a hundred supposed witches in East Anglia. The movie’s body count? A bit lower, but no less disturbing.
• The ending is a straight-up historical remix, Inglourious Basterds style. Reality says Hopkins died peacefully in bed. Cinema says, “axe him to bits and shoot him for good measure.” Cinema wins.

 

This official certainly got the axe.

Michael Reeves directs Witchfinder General – aka The Conqueror Worm – with a brutal clarity that rips away all gothic frills. There are no haunted castles, no supernatural spooks, just human beings at their worst. Reeves refuses to let you escape into fantasy. The violence is ugly, the countryside eerily calm, and the horror comes not from demons but from authority figures who abuse power for profit and lust. The young director clashed with Vincent Price on set, but that tension bleeds into the film. Hopkins is cold, clinical, and detached; a villain who doesn’t shout or snarl but instead calmly orders torture like he’s selecting wine.

 

You can’t put a Price on talent.

This was also a rare outing for American International Pictures, better known at the time for schlocky drive-in fare. Here, AIP backed a film rooted in grim historical reality, and it stands out precisely because of that grounding. Hopkins was a real figure, a self-appointed “Witchfinder General” who spread fear for personal gain. Reeves uses him as a symbol of corruption and hypocrisy, painting a chilling portrait of what happens when unchecked power collides with mass hysteria.

 

This is not an era I’d ever care to visit.

Vincent Price is, of course, magnificent. Stripped of his usual theatrical flourishes, he plays Hopkins with icy restraint, making him far scarier than any cackling mad scientist or gothic villain he’d done before. This is Price weaponizing subtlety, and it’s arguably one of the finest performances of his career. Ian Ogilvy does solid work as Richard Marshall, though his character is mostly required to look grim, shout a lot, and swing swords with Roundhead enthusiasm. Hilary Dwyer brings a tragic dignity to Sara, though she’s saddled with an almost unendurably grim arc. Robert Russell, meanwhile, goes full scumbag as Stearne. If Hopkins is cold calculation, Stearne is brutish cruelty. Together, they make one of cinema’s most revolting villain duos.

Note: Vincent Price hated the role at first and clashed badly with director Michael Reeves, who wanted a younger actor. Ironically, Price’s subtle, restrained performance ended up being one of the best of his career.

In conclusion, Witchfinder General is not an easy watch, but it’s a necessary one. It strips horror down to its bleakest form, showing us that human evil needs no supernatural justification. Reeves’s direction, Coquillon’s unflinching lens, and Price’s chillingly restrained performance all combine to make this one of the most disturbing films of the 1960s. It’s horror not dressed up in cobwebs and organ music but horror born from real history—and maybe that’s why it lingers.

Douglas Fairbanks in Robin Hood (1922) – Review

1922’s Robin Hood – released as Douglas Fairbanks in Robin Hood – is one of those silent-era spectacles that makes you wonder if early Hollywood briefly lost its collective mind and decided to build an entire medieval city just for fun. Released at the absolute height of the silent swashbuckler craze, the film exists largely as a grand showcase for the unstoppable athletic charisma of Fairbanks. The result is a massive, lavish, occasionally goofy adventure that helped define what we now think of as the classic Robin Hood legend on screen.

The film opens with the dashing Earl of Huntingdon (Douglas Fairbanks) besting his bitter enemy, Sir Guy of Gisbourne (Paul Dickey), in a jousting match, establishing right away that this fellow is the kind of man who wins tournaments before breakfast. Huntingdon then joins King Richard the Lion-Hearted (Wallace Beery), who is heading off to the Crusades and leaves his less-than-trustworthy brother, Prince John (Sam De Grasse), in charge as regent. Naturally, this proves to be about as wise as leaving a fox in charge of the royal henhouse, as Prince John soon reveals himself to be a cruel, scheming tyrant who, encouraged by Sir Guy, decides he quite likes the throne and takes it.

 

A right pair of villains.

Back in the Holy Land, Huntingdon receives a message from Lady Marian Fitzwalter (Enid Bennett), his beloved, explaining that England has gone straight to the dogs under Prince John’s rule. He requests permission from King Richard to return home and help sort things out, but Richard—apparently in no mood for nuance—assumes the Earl is trying to dodge crusading duties and denies the request. When Huntingdon attempts to leave anyway, Sir Guy ambushes him, has him branded a deserter, and tosses him in prison. After escaping captivity, the Earl risks both life and reputation to return to England, only to find that he and his friends have been declared outlaws and that Marian is believed to be dead.

 

“I think it’s time for a career change.”

Refusing to let tyranny ruin everyone’s day, Huntingdon reinvents himself as Robin Hood, the acrobatic champion of the oppressed. From the greenwood of Sherwood Forest, he gathers a merry band: Friar Tuck (Willard Louis), Little John (Alan Hale), Will Scarlet (Bud Geary), and Allan-a-Dale (Lloyd Talman)—and proceeds to make Prince John and the Sheriff of Nottingham’s lives an absolute nightmare through daring raids and cheerful lawbreaking. Robin rescues Marian from Prince John’s clutches, defeats Sir Guy in a climactic clash, and is briefly captured before the timely return of King Richard restores order, reunites Robin with Marian, and reminds Prince John that attempted royal usurpation is generally frowned upon.

 

“I declare a happy ending!”

Stray Observations:

• This is a rare Robin Hood who seems oddly afraid of women. He’ll leap castle walls and fight armies without blinking, but gets strangely awkward whenever Marian appears.
• Little John is first introduced as Huntingdon’s squire, but the fact that he is left behind when Huntingdon goes off to the Crusades is a little odd.
• Huntingdon asks the King for permission to return to England, but without telling him why, for…. reasons? Is this stupidity, or simply to add dramatic tension?
• Sir Guy of Gisbourne uses his own dagger in his failed attempt at regicide. Yeah, not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
• In this version, the famous quarterstaff fight is not between Robin Hood and Friar Tuck, but between Friar Tuck and a disguised King Richard.
• The enormous castle and Nottingham sets were constructed at the Pickford–Fairbanks Studio and were so massive that they became tourist attractions during production.
• Some of the sets were designed by architect Lloyd Wright, son of legendary architect Frank Lloyd Wright, which may make this the only medieval adventure movie with a serious architectural pedigree.
• Alan Hale, who plays Little John here, would go on to reprise the role again in 1938’s The Adventures of Robin Hood, starring Errol Flynn.
• The Sheriff’s guards are hilariously incompetent at catching Robin, which becomes a recurring theme of basically every Robin Hood story ever told.
• Some prints include an early Technicolor sequence during the court pageantry, which must have blown audiences’ minds in 1922.

 

Today, it’s still rather impressive.

One of the most jaw-dropping aspects of Robin Hood is simply how enormous it is. The filmmakers didn’t just build a few backdrops and call it Nottingham; they constructed an entire medieval city on the Pickford-Fairbanks Studio lot in Hollywood, complete with massive stone gates, towers, and streets filled with extras. The castle alone looks large enough to withstand a genuine siege. When hundreds of performers flood through the courtyard, the film briefly resembles a historical epic decades before Hollywood perfected the form. For a 1922 production, the scale borders on the absurd in the best possible way.

 

That scale also came with a staggering price tag. 

The film reportedly cost around $1 million, which in modern terms works out to roughly $19 million—an astronomical budget for the silent era. You can see every dollar on screen: giant sets, elaborate costumes, enormous crowd scenes, and production design that feels far more ambitious than most films of its time. It’s the sort of spectacle that only early Hollywood, drunk on its own newfound power, would attempt. Even beyond the physical scale, the film shows a surprising level of visual sophistication in its use of colour tinting, a common silent-era technique where different scenes were bathed in specific hues. Cool blues suggest night or secrecy, warm ambers evoke torchlit interiors, and other tints help guide the audience through changing locations and moods. The result is that this silent film quietly uses colour with impressive effectiveness, adding atmosphere and emotional texture long before full-colour cinema became the norm.

 

The colour of romance.

As an adaptation of the Robin Hood legends, the film takes a few liberties but captures the spirit of the mythology remarkably well. Instead of starting with Robin already in Sherwood Forest, it gives us a full origin story for the Earl of Huntingdon, turning him into a nobleman who deliberately becomes an outlaw in order to fight tyranny. This adds a sense of heroic sacrifice to the story while still delivering all the classic elements: Sherwood Forest, the merry men, the wicked Prince John, and a whole lot of cheerful rebellion against corrupt authority. In many ways, the movie codifies the version of Robin Hood that later films would follow. The noble outlaw, the merry brotherhood, the romantic bond with Marian, and the climactic return of King Richard all appear here in a form that later adaptations would refine but rarely replace.

 

“You’ve been a terrible brother.”

The influence of 1922’s Robin Hood on later adventure films is enormous. The movie helped establish the swashbuckler as a major Hollywood genre, laying the groundwork for the sword-fighting spectacles that would dominate the 1930s and 1940s. You can see its DNA in everything from the Errol Flynn Robin Hood films to later adventure heroes like Zorro, pirates, musketeers, and pretty much any cinematic rogue who prefers rooftops and rope swings to walking through doors like a normal person. Its action style—acrobatic, playful, and heavily centred around a charismatic hero—became the template for decades of adventure cinema. Modern action films may rely more on explosions and CGI, but the basic appeal of a fearless hero performing outrageous physical feats started here.

Stunt Note: Despite warnings from his brother and studio executives about the danger, as Fairbanks was both the star and producer, making an injury a huge financial risk, he insisted on performing the climb, where he shimmied up the chains of a rising 40-foot drawbridge.

And of course, none of this works without Douglas Fairbanks himself. Fairbanks wasn’t just the star of the film; he was the engine driving the entire spectacle. His performance is packed with athletic stunts, climbing walls, swinging across beams, and leaping around the giant sets like gravity is merely a suggestion. In many ways, Fairbanks was the prototype for modern action stars. Long before stunt doubles and digital trickery became standard practice, he insisted on doing many of his own stunts, giving the film a physical authenticity that still feels impressive today. If modern audiences look at Tom Cruise dangling off airplanes and skyscrapers, they’re basically watching a tradition that Fairbanks helped invent.

 

Fairbanks, a truly charismatic action hero.

A century later, Robin Hood remains one of the most ambitious productions of the silent era. Its gigantic sets, lavish costumes, and huge crowd scenes feel like a statement piece from a young Hollywood eager to prove it could rival any spectacle in the world. The film may move at a leisurely silent-era pace and occasionally indulge in theatrical melodrama, but its charm, humour, and sheer sense of adventure remain infectious. Most importantly, Douglas Fairbanks’ exuberant performance gives the movie an energy that still leaps off the screen…sometimes literally, usually from the top of a castle wall.

The Living Skeleton (1968) – Review

Japanese horror in the 1960s was a weird, wonderful experiment in atmosphere and existential dread, and The Living Skeleton might be its most gloriously unhinged specimen. Directed by Hiroshi Matsuno for Shochiku Studios, this black-and-white maritime nightmare blends ghost story, revenge thriller, and Catholic guilt trip into a single eerie fever of fog and bones. It’s as if Gothic horror crashed headlong into Scooby-Doo and decided, “Sure, why not?”

We open with a bang, and by bang, I mean pirates with machine guns, so definitely not the Jack Sparrow variety. This gang of cheerful psychopaths commandeer a ship, mow down the crew, and dump the victims’ bodies overboard, chaining them together like some kind of nautical macramé project. Among the dead are newlyweds Yoriko (Kikko Matsuoka) and her husband, Doctor Nishizato (Kô Nishimura), though don’t expect the film to explain how everyone got this far without questioning a ship named The Dragon King crewed by pirates in turtlenecks.

With this kind of villain, you just roll with it.

Enter Saeko (also Kikko Matsuoka), Yoriko’s twin sister, now living under the wing of a suspiciously handsome Catholic priest (Masumi Okada) whose kindness feels about as genuine as a televangelist’s tax receipts. Saeko is still mourning her sister when she goes scuba diving with her boyfriend Mochizuki (Yasunori Irikawa), who’s either an oceanographer or just really into getting her into a wetsuit. Down below, they find something unsettling: a whole crowd of skeletons chained together under the sea, swaying like a particularly bleak synchronized swimming team. Because this is a horror movie, they don’t immediately call the cops, a scientist, or literally anyone, with Mochizuki trying to pass it off as a hallucination or seaweed.

Yeah, skeletal-shaped seaweed, for sure.

Then things get weird(er). A mysterious fog rolls in, and a ghostly ship appears on the horizon—yep, it’s the same death barge from three years ago, now doing its best impression of The Flying Dutchman. Saeko races off into the night to board the deserted ship to investigate, leaving her poor, befuddled boyfriend in her wake. Because when a cursed phantom ship materializes offshore, clearly the best move is to go aboard. Once on the creaking, cobwebbed vessel, Saeko starts hearing voices, seeing skeletons chained to the walls, and realizing she looks exactly like one of the murdered passengers.

Cue the world’s creepiest case of déjà vu.

Unsurprisingly, people start dying, a vengeful spirit stalks the pirates, and twin identities get tangled up in a supernatural vendetta that makes Dark Shadows look like Blue’s Clues. By the time the priest’s dark secret surfaces – along with some well-hidden scars – and the skeletons claw their way out of watery graves, The Living Skeleton shifts gears from eerie ghost story to full-blown bone opera. In the chaos that follows—fog is rolling in, murder is in the offing, candles sputtering, and dudes are melted by acid —the truth comes crashing down: Turns out that Dr. Nishizato had survived the massacre and has been using blood transfusions in an attempt to bring his bride back to life. Because that makes sense. The final act erupts in acid, blood, and divine payback, as innocence and evil blur into one spectral scream of justice, leaving only the sea to wash it all away.

And no, I have no idea what the fuck went down.

Stray Observations:

• Crew and passengers being machine-gunned down by ruthless pirates aboard a ship carrying gold gives off strong vibes of Ghost Ship from 2002.
• Saeko’s reaction to finding chained skeletons underwater is basically, “Huh, that’s odd.” Girl, that’s a crime scene.
• The film trots out the “identical twins have a psychic bond” trope, only here, it works from beyond the grave. Or is it?
• The underwater skeletons are so well preserved that they’d make a museum curator weep. Apparently, the ocean’s great for bone maintenance.
• Bats appear as harbingers of death, making me wonder if these ghosts were related to Dracula.
• The ending is pure gothic melodrama: fire, death, religion, skeletons, and regret. You half expect Vincent Price to wander in and offer everyone a monologue.

I would never have guessed “mad science” was an ingredient.

Hiroshi Matsuno directs The Living Skeleton with a quiet precision that makes its eventual descent into ghostly chaos all the more satisfying. He’s not afraid of long silences, drifting fog, or shots that linger just a little too long on the horizon as if waiting for something dreadful to emerge. It’s a style equal parts Gothic romance and maritime noir, and while the pacing occasionally wobbles like a rowboat in a typhoon, the film’s eerie visual language keeps you hypnotized. Matsuno wrings maximum dread from minimalist settings, using sound design, creaking boards, tolling bells, and murmuring waves to make the ocean itself feel haunted.

Who else had “The Priest was involved” on their bingo card?

Masayuki Katō’s cinematography deserves serious credit. Shot in crisp black and white, the film’s lighting shifts between the luminous (the underwater skeletons shimmering in the dark) and the nightmarish (the ghost ship’s glowing silhouette against black water). Katō manages to make the sea both beautiful and terrifying, a reflective void that swallows light, sound, and reason. The camera moves with a funereal grace, as if haunted by its own subjects. Every frame could double as a ghost story told by moonlight.

A haunting beauty with a taste for revenge.

Then there are the WTF moments. The priest’s sudden heel-turn into demonic insanity. All glorious. Shochiku Studios, known for genteel dramas and sci-fi oddities, went through a brief but glorious phase in the late ’60s where they asked, “What if we made horror… but really weird?” Alongside films like Goké, Body Snatcher from Hell, The Living Skeleton represents the apex of this bizarre experiment: part art film, part grindhouse ghost story. It’s Japanese horror trying to out-Gothic Hammer Films and succeeding in sheer mood, if not coherence.

The sea rarely gives up its dead.

In conclusion, The Living Skeleton is a wild cocktail of ghosts, guilt, and gorgeous gloom. It’s atmospheric, ridiculous, and haunting in equal measure; a movie that makes you laugh at its logic while admiring its audacity. Matsuno crafts a ghost story that feels both deeply Japanese in its sense of moral retribution and playfully Western in its Gothic trappings. For a film about revenge from beyond the grave, it’s remarkably alive, with style, menace, and the eternal question of why anyone thought scuba diving near pirate corpses was a good idea.

Goke, Body Snatcher from Hell (1968) – Review

There’s weird, and then there’s Goke, Body Snatcher from Hell, a movie so jaw-droppingly odd it makes you wonder if everyone involved was under the influence of either experimental sake or sheer despair. Directed by Hajime Sato, this 1968 “sci-fi horror” flick tries to combine political satire, vampire aliens, and airplane disaster melodrama, and ends up crash-landing somewhere between Plan 9 from Outer Space and a fevered dream about space goo. It’s colourful, campy, and occasionally brilliant but mostly just bonkers.

After receiving a radio message about a bomb threat on their flight, co-pilot Sugisaka (Teruo Yoshida) does the sensible thing — he checks everyone’s bags like he’s running airport security solo. Everything seems fine until stewardess Kuzumi (Tomomi Satō) finds an unaccompanied suitcase with a rifle inside, because apparently, this airline has looser screening standards than Spirit Airlines. The owner of said rifle turns out to be a hijacker, Hirofumi Teraoka (Hideo Ko), who promptly pulls a gun and demands to be flown to Okinawa. Mid-hijack, the radio bursts out with news about UFOs being chased by fighter jets, which is pretty much the movie’s way of saying, “Oh, you thought this was about terrorism? Think again.” A glowing flying saucer zooms by, fries the plane’s instruments, and sends it plummeting to the world’s emptiest island.

“Did anyone check to see if George Kennedy was on board?”

A handful of survivors crawl from the wreckage, including Sugisaka; Kuzumi; the perpetually complaining war widow Mrs. Neal (Kathy Horan); shady Senator Mano (Eizo Kitamura); sleazy weapons exporter Tokuyasu (Nobuo Kaneko), his miserable wife Noriko (Yuko Kusunoki); psychiatrist Momotake (Kazuo Kato); “space biologist” Professor Sagai (Nobuo Kaneko), and a teen who, for some reason, thought calling in a fake bomb threat would end well. The hijacker, having survived the crash through pure narrative stupidity, kidnaps Kuzumi and runs into the jungle, where he finds a glowing spaceship that looks like a lava lamp on legs. A blob of alien goo slithers toward him, his forehead splits open like a grotesque Pez dispenser, and voilà, we’ve got ourselves a vampire alien. Kuzumi, true to horror heroine form, faints dead away.

Insert coin to continue.

Sugisaka find and revives the unconscious Kuzumi, but when he asks her what happened, she faints again (seriously, this woman spends half the movie unconscious) and brings her back to the wreck. Later, under hypnosis — because nothing helps trauma like a little impromptu hypnosis — she recounts the blob encounter. The teenage bomber attacks the psychiatrist (for reasons never fully explained), who falls off a cliff and becomes the vampire’s next snack. The survivors then make the brilliant decision to bring the hijacker’s corpse back into the plane. Naturally, it turns out he’s not dead but very much undead, and soon Tokiyasu is drained like a Capri Sun. His wife Noriko, gets possessed by the alien, who informs them that they are a distant alien race called Gokemidoro and that “Our plan is to wipe out all of mankind,” then leaps off a cliff in protest of the movie’s script. But her corpse looks a little worse for wear.

Desiccated impact?

From here, the plot turns into a paranoid round of Lord of the Flies with added fangs. Professor Sagai theorizes about vampires and aliens while Senator Mano behaves like a cartoon villain, using the chaos to sacrifice people left and right. The teen bomber, now desperate, threatens to blow up everyone unless they let him back inside the plane. They don’t. He detonates himself, which is honestly the first intelligent choice anyone makes in the film. Mano and Mrs. Neal attempt to flee but end up face-to-face with the hijacker-vampire. Mano, a shining beacon of cowardice, throws her at the monster and runs. She misses every gunshot she takes and dies. Mano returns to the plane, locks everyone else out, and smugly watches as Sugisaka sets the vampire on fire using airplane fuel, an act of heroism that also reveals that yes, the characters had fire this whole time and somehow never thought to use it earlier.

“Did anyone think to bring marshmallows?”

Just when you think it’s over, it’s not. The goo leaves the burning corpse and leaps into Professor Sagai’s head, turning him into the next bloodsucking menace. After some light hillside tumbling, the alien leaves his body to dust and returns to its ship. Sugisaka and Kuzumi, having survived mostly through dumb luck and slow editing, stumble upon a highway filled with dead bodies, the entire population apparently wiped out. The Gokemidoro voice booms from nowhere, announcing humanity’s extinction, while a fleet of alien ships hovers in orbit, waiting to finish what the movie started: annihilation.

What a twist!

Stray Observations:  

• The plane’s “security measures” make the TSA look like the CIA.
• The hijacker’s evil plan? Go to Okinawa. That’s it.
• Professor Sagai spends most of the film explaining things no one asked for.
• Space Vampires have been handled better, such as in Queen of Blood and Lifeforce.
• Noriko’s death plunge is the most relatable moment. Who wouldn’t jump after all that nonsense?
• Mrs. Neal teams up with Mano mere minutes after he wanted to sacrifice her to the space vampire. Is she fickle or stupid? I can’t quite decide.
• The finale’s twist — “the aliens already won!” — is both chilling and unintentionally hilarious, since it implies Earth’s doom was caused by this cast of morons.

I’d say the Earth had it coming.

Hollywood has produced many airplane disaster movies over the years, the Universal Airport movies being prime examples of this, but Japan’s Goke, Body Snatcher from Hell attempts to one-up their American counterparts with a movie that not only has a bomber and a professional assassin on board the doomed flight but also a UFO and a space vampire to raise the stakes. Unfortunately, as baller as that sounds, the film is undercut at every turn by a cast of characters that range from completely unlikable to the “Too Stupid to Live” variety, and thus any tension the film tries to build is lost because I was okay with any of these idiotic people dying.

Agatha Christie’s “And Then There Were Dumb.”

Director Hajime Sato (Terror Beneath the Sea) gives the film a sleek visual flair that almost saves it. The use of primary colours, harsh lighting, and surreal backdrops creates a sense of otherworldly dread; it’s like a psychedelic apocalypse painted on a budget. Shizuo Hirase’s cinematography is the real MVP here, bathing the wreckage in vivid reds and eerie blues, making the desolate island feel both dreamlike and nightmarish. Unfortunately, Sato’s pacing is all over the place; scenes of genuine menace are immediately undercut by awkward dialogue and ham-fisted performances. It’s as if he wanted to make an existential horror film but accidentally directed a Saturday morning monster serial.

The flying saucer looked cool, so that’s something.

As an adaptation of the 1967 tokusatsu TV series Gokemidoro, this film faceplants spectacularly. The show, while cheap and silly, had some internal logic and clear world-building. The film throws all that out in favour of random deaths, inconsistent alien rules, and philosophical rambling about mankind’s moral decay. The Gokemidoro species — once meant to be an eerie parasitic lifeform — here feels like a metaphor that even the screenwriter forgot mid-sentence. Instead of tight sci-fi horror, we get moralizing speeches about humanity’s self-destruction delivered by characters who can’t go ten minutes without trying to murder each other.

The aliens make some solid points.

In conclusion, Goke, Body Snatcher from Hell is a cinematic paradox, beautiful to look at, painful to endure. It’s a masterclass in atmosphere sabotaged by writing so tone-deaf it borders on self-parody. Like its cast of doomed passengers, the film keeps trying to fly high but can’t stop crashing into its own absurdity. Hajime Sato’s direction and Shizuo Hirase’s visuals deserve praise, but everything else is a disaster zone of incoherence and overacting. Still, if you want to see a movie that turns alien vampirism into an art form of idiocy, buckle up, as turbulence doesn’t even begin to cover it.

The Tomb of Ligeia (1964) – Review

Roger Corman’s The Tomb of Ligeia is the last of his Poe cycle with Vincent Price, and it goes out with a whisper rather than a bang—a whisper wrapped in gothic fog, cat scratches, and questionable romantic decisions. It’s a slow-burn blend of death, obsession, and reincarnated cats, with more hypnotic mumbo-jumbo than a Victorian séance. Still, if you like your horror moody, literate, and filmed among actual ruins instead of papier-mâché, this one’s your cup of arsenic-laced tea.

A funeral kicks things off beside the crumbling majesty of Castle Acre Priory, where a coffin with a built-in picture window lets mourners admire the departed Ligeia (Elizabeth Shepherd) one last time. Because nothing says “eternal rest” like being ogled after death. Suddenly, a black cat—because of course there’s a black cat—leaps onto the casket and apparently steals her soul through sheer feline audacity. This is our first clue that this is no ordinary burial and that this woman takes “rest in peace” as more of a suggestion.

Can a cat wake the dead?

Verden Fell (Vincent Price), our ever-dramatic widower, is mourning hard enough to make Hamlet look emotionally balanced. He broods in his abbey ruins, hides behind sunglasses, and broods some more—mostly about how Ligeia didn’t believe in God and might still be hanging around to prove her point. Then, as luck or bad screenwriting would have it, he bumps into the spirited Lady Rowena (also played by Elizabeth Shepherd), who sees this dark, spooky man in funereal sunglasses and thinks, Yes, that’s husband material. Despite being engaged to his friend Christopher Gough (John Westbrook), she pursues Fell until he finally gives in and marries her. Naturally, the honeymoon suite comes with the ghost of the ex-wife.

A Bridal Path of Terror.

Rowena is terrorized by dreams, whispers, and that same black cat who’s been hanging around since the funeral, acting like it pays rent. Every attempt to kill the cat ends badly, and Fell starts looking like he’s auditioning for Cat People: The Midlife Crisis Edition. From there, it’s gothic chaos on a slow simmer. Gough soon discovers that Ligeia’s body in the tomb is actually a wax copy, and the real corpse is hidden away in a secret chamber of the abbey, where Fell may have been performing inexplicable, unnatural acts with it. (You know, normal grieving husband stuff.) The finale sees Fell and Ligeia (now in cat form) having a literal catfight in the tomb as fire consumes everything. Fell strangles the cat—metaphor alert!—and dies with her in the flames. Meanwhile, Rowena and Christopher ride off to start fresh, probably somewhere with fewer crypts and cursed cats.

Question: How often do Price’s characters die in flames?

Stray Observations:

• Vincent Price’s dark glasses make him look like a 19th-century jazz pianist who wandered into the wrong movie.
• Ligeia’s coffin has a glass panel for face viewing. Creepy? Yes. Practical for undead reanimation? Also, yes.
• The film’s abbey exteriors were shot on location at Norfolk’s Castle Acre Priory, giving it a real sense of decay instead of Corman’s usual cardboard castles.
• On their second meeting, Fell attacks and almost strangles Rowena, so of course, she falls in love with him.
• The love triangle (or quadrangle, if you count the cat) could have been resolved with therapy and fewer crypt visits.
• No one in this movie ever opens a window, lights a candle properly, or questions why the cat keeps attacking Rowena.

She’s got cat scratch fever!

Roger Corman initially didn’t want Vincent Price in this one—sacrilege, I know. He thought Price was too old to play Verden Fell, who in the script was supposed to be a brooding, mid-thirties intellectual type. Corman had his heart set on Richard Chamberlain, who would’ve brought a more romantic youthfulness (and fewer existential sighs per minute). But American International Pictures wasn’t having it: their money came with Price attached. So Corman relented, and thank goodness he did, because even if he was twice the intended age, Price is the movie. His melancholy grandeur and velvet-voiced despair elevate what might’ve been a limp gothic rerun into something hypnotic.

He puts the “Goth” in Gothic.

Still, Corman wasn’t wrong about one thing: The Tomb of Ligeia did mark the point where the Poe series began to wheeze a little. “All of the Poe films made money,” Corman later said, “but Tomb of Ligeia made the least. I think it was because the series was just running out of steam, and also because it was overly complicated.” He’s right—the film is gorgeous but talky, intellectual but a bit emotionally remote. Yet it’s also a rare entry in the Corman/Poe cycle to be shot outside the confines of the studio, allowing for some striking daylight sequences amid the English countryside. Those real-world exteriors lend the movie an airy melancholy that contrasts beautifully with the claustrophobic interiors of the earlier films. It feels like a closing chapter—a misty farewell to both Poe’s obsessions and Corman’s lush gothic experiments.

Love among the ruins.

The original Poe story is barely a dozen pages long, more an eerie mood piece than a plot. Screenwriter Robert Towne (yes, Chinatown’s Robert Towne) had to dig deep into Poe’s entire body of work to craft something cinematic. He expanded on themes of mesmerism and necrophilia—yes, the love-that-won’t-die angle taken quite literally—and built a structure that allowed the story to exist on two levels: psychological and supernatural. Was Fell haunted by post-hypnotic suggestion, or was Ligeia truly possessing the living? The film never quite decides, and that ambiguity is both its greatest strength and its biggest frustration. You can’t help but admire Towne for tackling spiritual possession, atheism, and love beyond the grave in a movie where a cat sets everything on fire.

Trapped by the memory of Ligeia.

In conclusion, The Tomb of Ligeia may be the least successful of the Corman-Poe collaborations at the box office, but it’s also one of the most visually impressive and intellectually ambitious. Corman trades his usual studio sets for windswept ruins, and Vincent Price gives one of his more restrained, interior performances—haunted rather than hammy. It’s a film about obsession, guilt, and the horror of not letting go, even when the object of affection is trying to claw your face off from beyond the grave. Maybe it’s too cerebral for its own good, maybe it’s just too much Poe, but there’s still something intoxicating about its candlelit gloom and poetic despair.