The Hollywood remake machine is still in full swing and as we see more
and more of these watered down retreads one wonders if the studio execs
will ever stop (Note: That was a totally rhetorical question we all know
they won’t). Remaking a popular film is all about “
Brand Recognition”
where good feelings toward a past good product will hopefully translate
to sales on the new one; sadly this does work, well at least for the
opening weekend box office, before word of mouth kills it. That opening
weekend and Home Video sales mean a remake has better than even shot to
at least make its money back or possibly even make a profit. Good or bad
doesn’t even figure into it.
Director
José Padilha’s 2014 remake of
Robocop
is not a terrible film, but it certainly isn’t a good one either.
Padilha is on record as describing working on this project as “
The worst experience of my life”
because the studio wouldn’t allow him any creative control over their
product. He wanted to make a hard “R” rated film like the original but
they forced him to deliver a PG-13 rating to insure a wider audience to
recoup the ever expanding budget. So what we were left with was a tepid
action film where Robocop runs around armed with Taser Bullets.
Paul Verhoeven‘s
1987 original film
was a satiric look at society and consumerism. How corporate greed and
crime go hand in hand. Jump ahead to 2014 and that is a harder thing to
satirize now because much of what we saw in the original
Robocop we now see on the Six O’clock News. Minus the cool robots of course.
José Padilha’s film, like the original, is set in the near future where a
multinational corporation called Omnicorp has produced robot drones and
soldiers to police countries all over the world. Robots do “Stop and
Frisk” checks as they march down the streets of Tehran and lethally
blowing away any threats. The only thing stopping Omnicorp from getting
their products out on American streets is the “Dreyfus Act” which will
not allow unmanned robots to patrol American cities. CEO Raymond Sellers
(
Michael Keaton) comes up with a workaround. Put a human inside a robot, sway public opinion, get that bill repealed.
|
Hard to market this as a “Friendly Beat Cop.” |
Enter Dr. Dennett Norton (
Gary Oldman)
who is one of the worst written characters I’ve come across in some
time. He is the scientist behind Robocop but his motivations are almost
non-existent, and his morals swing back and forth like a crazed
pendulum. He’s introduced as the altruistic scientist who is using robot
prosthetic limbs to help people. A man who lost his hands can now play
the guitar again. He is approached by Raymond Sellers, his boss, with
this Robocop idea and at first he is against it because he was promised
that his work would never be put into military applications.
|
“I’m more of a confused scientist than an evil one.” |
He is convinced to get on board because the Robocop program will bring
in tons of money which can be used for his humanitarian causes. Oldman
tries to create a sympathetic character and then the script just jumps
the rails and has the good doctor electronically modifying Alex Murphy’s
brain so that when in combat mode the human part of him is just along
for the ride while the computer is in full control. And later, when
Murphy is showing a bit of emotional trauma, he drugs him into a zombie
state. Are these the actions of an altruistic humanitarian doctor? These
aren’t the actions of any doctor who has even heard of the Hippocratic
Oath. Of course in the third act he will rush to Murphy’s aid because he
suddenly realizes he’s been a complete ass-hat.
|
I’m sorry but a flesh hand on a robot is just stupid. |
Let’s talk villains. This film has several but unfortunately they are
all lame; CEO Raymond Sellers is the corporate head who doesn’t actually
break any laws until he decides to scrap Robocop because his being
human could become embarrassing. We have Antoine Vallon (
Patrick Garrow)
who is this film’s Clarence Boddicker but aside from failing to kill
Alex Murphy (twice), he is a non-entity and certainly not as scary as
Kurtwood Smith’s character from the original. Then there is Rick Mattox (
Jackie Earle Haley)
who runs the military robot program and hates the idea of a human
inside a robot. He’s in this movie just to be the Snidely Whiplash
dickhead but structurally serves no real purpose to the story.
|
“Rorschach’s journal, October 13th, 2015 tried to fight a robot…lost.” |
And as for Robocop himself, well
Joel Kinnaman
does his best with a very unbalanced script. His character has to go
from incorruptible hero cop to a man traumatized by being turned into a
machine, and then a zombie like automaton when he is brainwashed later
in the film. It’s like the writers took elements from the
Six Million Dollar Man and tried to graft them onto a world more in keeping with Steven Spielberg’s
Minority Report.
The actual design of Robocop isn’t too bad but I do hate the glowing
red Cylon visor. We also spend an inordinate amount of time dealing with
his family and as written I couldn’t care less about them.
|
“I’m sorry honey, I forgot the milk.” |
The original
Robocop was about a man who loses his
humanity and struggles to get it back, in this remake his character runs
into a few bumps along the way but for most of the film’s running time
Alex Murphy is still Alex Murphy. We never get that awesome ending
(spoilers) where the head of OCP asks, “Nice shooting, son. What’s your
name?” and is answered “Murphy.” That’s how you end a movie, that puts a
nice punctuation on a hero’s journey to find himself.
|
“Dead or alive…I mean stunned or asleep you’re coming with me.” |
I really wish we could have seen José Padilha’s true vision for
Robocop
because the one we got has just a couple cool action scenes, is
cluttered with characters whose only motivations are to move the story
forward whether or not it is logical, and then it ends in an insanely
stupid showdown.
Stray Observations:
• A car bomb that detonates when a person is about to get
into the car and not when they are actually inside is a poorly designed bomb.
• We are told that the villains all carry heavy enough caliber bullets
to kill Robocop. He is hit many, many times and yet they fail to kill
him.
• Samuel Jackson as some kind of Bill O’Reilly corporate shill does seem to be having fun.
• Every time this movie quoted lines from the original it just reminded me how much better Verhoeven’s movie is.
• The ending climax where Robocop faces off against evil CEO doesn’t make a lick of sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment